< Blue Crystal | Introduction to Xenobiology | Opal >
Vitrium is a small, warm world--a half-way point between Venus and Mars.A weak magnetic field and strong solar radiation have stripped it of most of its primordial volatiles, and particularly depleted it of hydrogen, leaving the surface heavily oxidized--but unlike Mars, and like Venus, Vitrium had enough sulfur to retain a small amount of hydrogen locked up in sulfuric acid, with a small amount (approximately 1.7%) of dissolved water. Many planetologists believe that Vitrium in fact passed through a Venusian stage in its early history, before losing enough atmosphere to cool down to the point that seas could form (with present-day surface temperatures ranging between 50 and 150C, comfortably in the middle of sulfuric acid's liquid range); others, however, think it more likely that the planet simply started out with a relatively low carbon fraction, such that early heating and hydrogen loss were driven primarily by a water, rather than CO2, atmosphere.
As on Venus, sulfuric acid forms clouds on Vitrium, as well as rain, and pools into numerous small seas. Sulfur trioxide also forms thin clouds in the upper atmosphere, but temperatures are too high to support liquid sulfur trioxide anywhere on the surface. The relatively small amount of surface liquid means that Vitrium has no globe-spanning oceans or well-defined global sea level, with most sea basins being entirely disconnected from each other, and having been disconnected for as long as the world was cool enough for seas to form. Nevertheless, lifeforms in each basin are broadly similar, indicating that the current biological system originated originated once and thence colonized the rest of the world.
As on Blue Crystal, life on Vitrium makes extensive use of silicon as a scaffolding element for biomolecules--but unlike Blue Crystal life, Vitrium's biology almost entirely avoids unstable Si-Si bonds, instead relying on strong silicon-oxygen bonds to form organosilicone, or siloxane, polymers, with Si-C and C-C bonds used in various functional groups (in particular, C-C bridges are frequently employed analogously to disulfide bridges used in Earthling biology, or peroxide bridges in Blue Crystal biology; despite the much greater bioavailability of sulfur on Vitrium, C-C bonds are sometimes required for their greater stability in Vitrium's higher temperature conditions), and fluorine is introduced as a much more common heteroatom than is found in either Earthling or Blue Crystal biology. In fact, the variety of silicone chemistry that is stabilized in a sulfuric acid solvent system seems to exactly balance what is lost to strictly organic chemistry in the same environment, and relatively stiff fluorinated polymers serve to simplify many aspects of membrane structure and enzyme function by introducing a third "fluorophilic" phase, in addition to hydrophilic and lipophilic chemical phases, for controlling chemical segregation.
This, of course, leads us to one of the great paradoxes of Vitrium biology: while on most life-bearing worlds, the base oxidation states of common biomolecules seem correlated to the prevailing geochemistry, thus minimizing anabolic energy expenditure and maximizing structural stability, with the exception of its primary solvent (H2SO4) and fluorolipids, Vitrium's biology seems shockingly under-oxidized. This is a direct result of sulfuric acid's destabilization of much of the carbon-oxygen chemistry that occurs in Earthling biology via the dehydration mechanism. Any biomolecule or close complex containing large quantities of both oxygen and hydrogen is subject to spontaneous degradation to draw more water into solution.
Sulfuric acid also destabilizes many halide salts, which has resulted in significant quantities of hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acid dissolved in the seas as well, although in lower proportions than water. This of course explains the higher availability of fluorine to Vitrium's ecology, but it is also essential to silicon fixation. While inorganic carbon is readily available in gaseous form as carbon dioxide, just as on Earth, inorganic silicon is typically trapped in solid silicate form; and while silica is usually much more susceptible at attack in alkaline environments (a fact which is exploited by the Blue Crystal biosphere to fix inorganic silicon), it is also specifically vulnerable to hydrofluoric acid. A critical base layer of Vitrium's global ecology thus relies on actively concentrating hydrofluoric acid to dissolve silica out of rocks and sediment in order to make it available to biological processes.
All vascularized life on Vitrium also concentrates hydrofluoric acid in its tissues to some extent to improve handling of silica (an adaptation that seems to have developed independently multiple times in different multicellular lineages), but, just as on Blue Crystal, oxidation of food back to crystalline or amorphous silica happens only in microorganisms which can easily eject the resulting crystals from their cells, except where silica deposition is used for structural purposes (e.g., shell-building, where opaline silica fills a similar role as calcium carbonate, which does not exist in Vitrium's chemical environment, does on Earth). Siloxane food molecules are typically broken down into silanol (H3Si(OH)) units which are then repackaged into disiloxane gas (the silicon analog of dimethyl ether) for elimination with the energy-producing release of water.
Some atmospheric and oceanic disiloxane is taken up by autotrophs as a pre-fixed silicon source, but just like carbon being recycled into carbon dioxide, and nitrogen being recycled back into N2 gas by denitrifying organisms (a niche which exists on Vitrium just as it does on Earth), organic silicon is eventually recycled back into granular silica by "desilifying" organisms, which also consume atmospheric sulfur trioxide to reconstitute sulfuric acid from the water produced by oxidizing hydrogens. Meanwhile, both carbon and silicon fixation by autotrophs release oxygen and sulfur trioxide into the atmosphere after splitting hydrogens from sulfuric acid.
Like water and LN2, clean sulfuric acid is a visually clear liquid, and not susceptible to easy photodegradation. However, it is also a much stronger ionic solvent than water, and, as a result, very little sulfuric acid on Vitrium appears actually transparent, with the seas and typical bodily fluids being generally brown in color. At an ecological level, this means the photic zone of Vitrium's seas is only a few millimeters to a few centimeters thick. Photosynthesis occurs strictly at the surface, and deep-sea creatures, which rely on marine snow for nutrition, are universally eyeless. Among land organisms, both compound and liquid-filled camera-like eyes exist, but these depend on active filtration to produce ocular fluids that are, in fact, transparent.
The modern, largely biogenic, atmosphere is composed primarily of nitrogen, with large quantities of CO2, SO3, and free oxygen, and trace quantities of disiloxane and hydrofluoric, hydrochloric, and sulfuric acid vapor.
Direct interaction with Vitrium organisms is impractical; Vitrium biology is violently toxic to Earthlings, and vice versa, with Vitrium biofluids causing corrosion and exothermic dehydration of Earthling cells, and exposure to high concentrations of water vapor or damp surfaces causing osmotic lysis and strong heating of Vitrium tissues (similar to the reactions of Rust native lifeforms). Even with active cooling and chemically-resistant environment suits, human presence in Vitrium environments is strongly discouraged, with investigation being done through robotic remotes. Off-world transport of Vitrium specimens is, however, relatively straightforward, once remote manipulation is accounted for; Vitrium organisms operate in similar pressures to Earthlings, and many can be cooled to enter a state a state of reversible suspended animation, as long as temperature is maintained above 10C to avoid freezing.
The only trouble I see with this fictional world is the fact that the biology employs a silicone-based biochemistry in sulfuric acid.. I thought silicones were for the most part unstable in concentrated sulfuric acid? But I suppose this only proves to be a dent if these worlds were made with realism in mind...
ReplyDeleteArtificial silicone rubbers are attacked sulfuric acid, but that's not a problem for silicone biochemistry; in fact, it's evidence that polysiloxane polymers can dissolve in sulfuric acid, which is exactly what you want out of a foundational biopolymer. See https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/10/6/84
DeleteCarbohydrates, on the other hand are completely destroyed by sulfuric acid, so if you want *any* kind of biochemistry in sulfuric acid, organosilicon is the way to go.
I hold great love for all these pages, long after noticing the first flaws they had. I'll leave some suggestions for fixes here (and a passing compliment or two), assuming you'll revamp this in the same way you seemingly will do with Opal.
ReplyDelete- Just wording: 98.3% H₂SO₄'s liquid range is ~10°C–338°C, so the midpoint is outside the surface temperature interval (50–150°C).
- How could the native life colonize the oceans when they've already been separated since they condensed into pools? Permanently isolated hydrography plus a biosphere of single origin doesn't tend to yield a global population. Maybe specify another way of spreading? Or perhaps an ancient superocean has since dried out?
- "Seems to exactly balance what is lost to strictly organic chemistry." Unfalsifiable claim.
- C–C bonds as analogues to S–S bonding on Earth are implausible. The overwhelming majority of the seas, and the cellular solvent, possesses sulfur atoms in their most oxidized state (+6). Wouldn't a C–C bond implicitly make the involved carbons not be in their maximum oxidized state? We Earthlings, of course, live in an oxidizing atmosphere and we aren't burning, since such processes on their own have poor kinetics. It would've been nice if there were an outlined antioxidant mechanism involved in keeping these atoms reduced despite the medium.
- You only mention half of Vitrium's Paradox. All the sulfuric acid does a great job at eliminating oxidized moieties, but you don't mention why reduced groups remain safe when H₂SO₄ would oxidize them. What if the cells' more sensitive, reduced groups were shielded by the very resistant aforementioned perfluorinated phase? The fix is already there for the writing!
- Silica takes over structural roles, but I think CaCO₃ has another point against it: calcium, sequestered as its sulfate already, would be very insoluble in these oceans. The local biota *had* to pivot to silica for their shells because all the calcium is already sequestered as anhydrite deposits.
- I really like the detail of siloxanes being broken down to silanols. Condensation of Si–OH bonds into the "ether" is far more thermodynamically favorable than the C–OH ones we must contend with, requiring acid catalysis.
- An energy production mechanism shouldn't just be an exothermic reaction; we don't burn glucose for heat, after all. I have come up with two ideas:
-- (ATP-like)) Silanols resulting from digestion immediately react with bisulfate to form a silyl sulfate intermediate (R₃Si–O–SO₃H), which can then react with other silanols or silyl sulfate intermediates to yield the Si–O–Si bond, with prior activation by an enzyme.
-- (More exotic) Silanols resulting from digestion are immediately bound into a carrier enzyme. The enzyme has a donor arm in a cage-like structure that coordinates to the Si atom, turning it into a hypercoordinate center. This form, which should resemble a silatrane (and, as such, needs to be protected from the bulk solvent, perhaps within the perfluorinated phase), stabilizes the silanol and stores energy in the form of ring strain and coordination. The hypercoordinate silicon has to be attacked by a nucleophile to disengage it from its "cage," but that is tricky in sulfuric acid. Maybe the enzyme itself comes ready with a silanolate, bisulfate/sulfate oxygen in some part, or some other method to force the Si–O–Si bond to form.
- I wish nitrogen's role was more fleshed out. The only thing we get is that there are also denitrifying organisms that create N₂ gas. Their existence implies an existing pool of oxidized nitrogen compounds, and for these organisms to exist in the long term, there must also be nitrogen fixation. Or maybe directly mention they're of lesser importance and happen to use nitrates as an electron acceptor.
- The atmospheric composition should've been in the first paragraph, and it's jarring by comparison with the other pages, whose components are described with partial pressures or composition by percentage.
> I'll leave some suggestions for fixes here (and a passing compliment or two), assuming you'll revamp this in the same way you seemingly will do with Opal.
DeleteThanks! Feedback is always appreciated.
> How could the native life colonize the oceans when they've already been separated since they condensed into pools?
Microorganisms being spread by wind, moved around in rainclouds. Terrestrial organisms spreading until they reach a new sea. Maybe there were multiple origins, but one just outcompeted the rest.
> "Seems to exactly balance what is lost to strictly organic chemistry." Unfalsifiable claim.
In the real world, yeah. The conceit of these articles, though, is that they are being written by xenobiologists who have actually studied these worlds, and know a lot more details than are contained here. So, in-world, they are justified in the claim, even though in reality it is purely speculative.
> C–C bonds as analogues to S–S bonding on Earth are implausible.
That's not something I invented! In the eventual final drafts of these, I'll have to do a better job of documenting all of the articles I used for reference. Alkynes and alkenes are easily oxidized by sulfuric acid, but single C-C bonds are relatively stable. The chemistry is not exactly equivalent--C-C bridges are more easily broken down in sulfuric acid than S-S bridges are in water--but as you note, we manage to survive being made of reduced materials in an oxidizing environment.
> You only mention half of Vitrium's Paradox. All the sulfuric acid does a great job at eliminating oxidized moieties, but you don't mention why reduced groups remain safe when H₂SO₄ would oxidize them.
Well, that's 'cause its a very diverse topic. Some reduced functional groups from our biology *aren't* stable! And some are. E.g., simple methyl groups (unless attached to a aromatic ring) are mostly unattacked by sulfuric acid. Sometimes hydrogen-terminated bonds would be replaced by more oxidized fluorine or hydroxyl groups.
> What if the cells' more sensitive, reduced groups were shielded by the very resistant aforementioned perfluorinated phase? The fix is already there for the writing!
That is indeed one possible solution! Analogous to certain reactive portions of Earthling enzymes being shielded by lipophilic phases.
Delete> Silica takes over structural roles, but I think CaCO₃ has another point against it: calcium, sequestered as its sulfate already, would be very insoluble in these oceans. The local biota *had* to pivot to silica for their shells because all the calcium is already sequestered as anhydrite deposits.
Very true. I wouldn't look at it in terms of "pivoting", though; they just never had access to calcium minerals in the first place.
> I really like the detail of siloxanes being broken down to silanols. Condensation of Si–OH bonds into the "ether" is far more thermodynamically favorable than the C–OH ones we must contend with, requiring acid catalysis.
:)
> An energy production mechanism shouldn't just be an exothermic reaction; we don't burn glucose for heat, after all. I have come up with two ideas:
Absolutely! The fact that all the energetic reactions would eb enzyme-mediated through multiple intermediate stages is just kind of assumed; out-of-world, because it's just not practical to design everything in full detail, in-world because these are introductory texts and you'd get the full details if you decided to specialize in a particular world's chemistry. Kind of like how we learn about the large-scale chemical formulae for photosynthesis and respiration first, and then maybe you dive into the details of the Krebs Cycle and Calvin Cycle, etc. in high school. But thanks for the suggestions! I'll definitely think about incorporating them in future revisions.
> I wish nitrogen's role was more fleshed out.
That's fair!
> The atmospheric composition should've been in the first paragraph, and it's jarring by comparison with the other pages, whose components are described with partial pressures or composition by percentage.
Also fair! Editing to put all of the Weird World articles into a common structural format is to-do-at-some-point item for me.
I'm excited to see the revisions! If I have free time I'll check on the remaining worlds to give suggestions for those too.
Delete